Optics Communications
113 (1994) 133-143Full length article
High-6 optical whispering-gallery microresonators:
precession approach for spherical mode analysis and emission patterns with prism couplers
M.L. Gorodetsky, V.S. Ilchenko
Physics Department of Moscow State University. 119899 Moscow, Russian Federation
Received 11 April 1994; revised manuscript received 1 September 1994Abstract
High-Q optical whispering-gallery modes TE(TM),„„, in spheroidal dielectric microresonators are shown to be equivalent to processing circular modes TE(TM )//,. with the rate of precession depending on the value of the residual resonator nonsphericity. This approach gives a natural interpretation to the characteristic two-lobe emission patterns of these modes with prism couplers. Spatial recognition of different modes on the basis of their emission patterns facilitates optimal coupling to selected modes. which is of interest for applications. Experimental results on the observation of two-lobe emission patterns and imaging of internal mode field distributions are presented. The feasibility of a single-prism transient filter and an optical delay line based on processing modes is discussed.
1. Introduction
A number of recent publications indicate the growing interest to the unique properties ofhigh-Q optical whispering-gallery modes (WGM) in spherical dielectric microresonators [ 1-11 ]. Small size (down to few tens of microns), high quality-factor (Q> 2x 109 demonstrated in fused silica microspheres [7,8]), strong field concentration in WGM, presence of evanescent field outside dielectric, and simplicity of laboratory-based fabrication open possibilities for different applications of spherical microresonators. They are proposed for use in QND energy measurement schemes via optical Kerr effect [1-3], narrow-band optical filtering [4], high-sensitivity motion sensors [5], direct lasing [6], laser frequency stabilization [ 9 ], probing of liquid dielectric properties [ 10 ], and cavity QED experiments with resonant atoms [8,11].
Presently, all experimental efforts have been fo
cused at reaching the highest possible Q and feasibility demonstrations of some of the proposed applications. No specific studies of mode spectra in high-Q solid-state spherical microresonators have been reported so far, nor have emission properties of different modes with existing prism couplers been investigated. Meantime, ultimate results in applications (especially in cavity QED experiments) require optimal coupling of the probe beams to selected given modes.
The whispering-gallery modes TE(TM)/^ (l~m, (?“/) have their e.m. field confined in annular "equatorial" area close to the resonator surface. Strongest field concentration is achieved in ÒÅ(ÒÌ)/ä (!=ò, i?=l) modes having single narrow maximum in "meridional" and in radial domains (hereafter, we shall call TE(TM)//i modes fundamental circular WGM). Roughly, these modes may be regarded as closed circular waves undergoing
0030-4018/94/S07.00 © 1994 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved SSDI 0030-4018 (94 )00494-3
M.L. Gorodetsky, y.S. Ikhenko / Optics Communications 113 (1994) 133-143
continuous total internal reflection from the inner surface of the sphere. Extension of this interpretation on other modes l+ m having wider field distribution is not so evident. In a perfect sphere, all modes with the same / and different m are frequency-degenerate. In real resonators, even a small residual nonspheric-ity removes this degeneracy and complicates the identification of modes by fitting spectral fragments in the frequency domain '.
Light can be inserted into the resonator by means of a coupling prism put at a small distance 0.1-U from the resonator surface. The probe beam is focused on the "touching point" under an angle providing total internal reflection, and the light tunnels through the small gap between the prism and the resonator. It is natural to expect that after making a number of orbits inside the sphere, the light will be re-emitted into the prism under the same angle and in the same plane of incidence in which the input beam has come. In the experiment, however, a different situation can be observed (see Sect. 3): the light matching in frequency to an observable high-0 mode, can be re-emitted in a different plane, as if the light orbit moved inside the sphere. This effect is analogous to the recently observed "precession of morphology-dependent resonances" (MDR) in resonance scattering of pulsed plane-wave laser radiation on deformed droplets of aerosols [12]. The authors ofRef. [12] interpreted this effect in terms of group angular velocity of MDRs, considered as a kind of wave packets inside the sphere. While traveling along the precessing orbital trajectory, MDR sequentially emits (through radiative leakage) light into upper and lower half-space divided by the symmetry plane of the droplet.
In this paper, we focus our attention on the following questions:
(i) If a similar effect is observed in solid spheroidal microresonators under monochromatic irradiation, what is the relation between the observed resonances and the classical electrodynamic solutions for E,Htmq modes? Is it possible to use symmet-
' Spectral identification of modes requires a precise knowledge of the resonator geometry, or at least, a very high level of sphericity when l+ m modes remain degenerate. Schiller and Byer [ 9 ] reported the frequency identification of optical WG modes with different /and q in a unique high-precision geometry (A/40) silica sphere 4 cm in diameter.
rical gaussian beams to excite modes with l+ m and
<?òÖ?(ii) What are the emission patterns of these modes with prism coupler and how can these patterns be used for their identification?
(iii) How may all these phenomena be interpreted in terms of quasi-geometrical approximation?
In our analysis (Sect. 2), we show that a classical electrodynamical solution for higher-order E,Htmy mode in a spheroid resonator is identical to the precessing inclined circular mode
Å,Íöó. This result gives a natural interpretation to the experimentally observed two-lobe emission patterns ofWG modes with prism coupler (Sect. 3) and facilitates their identification. The experimental results presented in Sect. 4 also include near-field distributions for different modes obtained by imaging the prism-resonator contact zone, and also speckle "portraits" of modes provided by residual surface scattering. Some further applications of WGMs based on their intrinsic precession property, are discussed in Sect. 5.2. Precession approach for mode analysis in spheroid resonators
The most popular approach for the description of spectra in dielectric spheres, Mie theory, gives good results in the analysis of elastic scattering of plane waves on relatively small spheres (up to few tens of wavelengths) with a rare spectrum of internal modes of moderate radiative Q. In whispering-gallery microresonators, only special modes having maximum Q are of interest, and practically all types of such modes (including those with ultra-high radiative Q in relatively large spheres) become accessible only with the help of prism couplers. In this context, a straightforward approach based on classical electro-dynamical solutions is more adequate, and a special analysis of resonator coupling to radiative modes in the prism is required.
The problem ofe.m. oscillation in dielectric sphere with refraction index ”r is solved explicitly. The mode field distribution is expressed via Debye potentials V(r,^v) [13],
ß-type (TE-modes)
E=rot(ri//) , f-type (TM-modes) £=rot rot(”4y) , (1)ML. Gorodetsky, V.S. llchenlw / Optics Communications 113(1994) 133-143
where
×/=ae-W^Y|^(p) \ji(kn,rYÕ-
.7/(b^)//z}"(^) h^^kr), r>R
+c.c..
(2)
where Y|,„=e""VPm (cosi9) are angular spherical functions. As a solution of a three-dimensional boundary-value problem, the field distribution is characterized by three indexes /, m, and q, where in denotes the number of field maxima in the "equator" plane (t?=0): q is the (number ofzeroes+ 1) of the Bessel function ji{kn^r} inside the resonator; /is the mode number (approximately equal to the number of wavelengths packed along the circumference of the resonator I” I'n.RnJ'k).
For the analysis of mode spectra in degenerate spherical resonators, only the radial part in (2) is essential as it determines the characteristic equation for resonant frequencies. In this article we pay special attention to the angular functions Y,^, because they determine the excitation and emission properties as well as the frequency splitting of l+ m modes in the spheroidal resonators.
If the characteristic dimensions are large enough, it is fruitful to use the quasiclassical approach. The simplest configuration is characteristic for the modes with l=m. In case of large /, such mode can be interpreted as a "gaussian" beam
(3)
having l/q internal reflections from the surface during one revolution inside the sphere.
The interpretation of other spherical modes Ó/,„ is not so evident. With the growth of
difference between / and w, "latitudinal" field distribution becomes a quickly oscillating function of i9 having a sharp cutoff at i9n,ax=7r/2+arccos(w/7).Let us show that an arbitrary spherical function can be modeled as a result of precession of inclined fundamental circular mode.
We shall obtain this result, first, by assuming that the resonator is slightly aspherical. Let it have the shape of a stretched or oblate spheroid (ellipsoid of
revolution) with the eccentricity
ñ and the symmetry axis directed along z-axis connecting poles in spherical system of coordinates, and let us monitor the evolution of an arbitrary-oriented gaussian beam with the Yn-mode type cross-section (3) inside the sphere. Let us also introduce a new system of coordinates characterized by Euler angles a, ft, and -y connected with this inclined mode. If such a beam starts propagating inside the spheroid in the plane with the normal inclined with respect to the symmetry axis of spheroid by Euler angle ft, it can form a stable orbit only if á =0. If the eccentricity is non-zero, after each revolution the beam will come to a shifted point at the equator, and therefore the orbit will in effect turn by the angle Aa (components Z.,. and L^ of the full angular momentum will no longer be preserved).In this way one can speak about precession with the rate determined by the value of eccentricity. If the length of the intracavity wave packet is longer than the full period of the precession (this is secured in case of monochromatic excitation and high Q of modes), the phase of precession becomes uncertain, just like the phase of optical wave bouncing between two mirrors in Fabry-Perot resonator. As a result, a stationary field distribution is formed. Below we show that under the condition of small eccentricity, the resulting field is in the first order of approximation identical to the undisturbed spherical harmonic (K/,„). As soon as the resonance condition (provided by the completion of complex spiral trajectory) is different from that of a single plane orbit, the frequency of each precessing resonance will be different from the initial frequency of degenerate K/„, modes.
First, let us show that angle ft cannot be arbitrary. During one orbit in the plane inclined with respect to the spheroid equator, the wave ex1p(i!ô) will acquire the phase shift equal to /Aa/cos ft (ô is the polar angle in the new system of coordinates (ô, Q) characterized by Euler angles a and ft). On the other hand, during resonance this phase shift must be equal to the phase shift in equatorial plane wAa, and hence we obtain the condition
cos P=m/l.
This simple analysis, by showing the discretization of the inclination angle ft,
gives a geometrical interpretation of the origin of spherical harmonics Ó/,„ anal-ML. Gorodetsky, V-S. Ilchenko / Optics Communications 113 (1994) 133-143
ogous to the quantization of the angular momentum projection L: in quantum mechanics.
The frequency shifts for precessing modes can be estimated from the change in the perimeter length for the inclined ellipse. Simple calculations yield in the first order of approximation:
^=±(-^-P=±e-2(p-^ w 4 4/2
where a positive sign stands for oblate spheroid, and negative sign for a stretched one. This simple estimate agrees well with the earlier reported calculations [14] by means of perturbation theory specially modified for open systems. The only small difference is that our expression for \u”/w contains /2 instead of /(/+ 1) in denominator. This discrepancy can be easily explained by the fact that a geometrical interpretation does not take into account the uncertainty of angular momentum for fundamental circular mode translating from nonzero cross-section of the beam:
{S^-^L^-L^KI+D-P^l.
The frequency shift (5) of "precessing" modes means that they are no longer degenerate with respect to m.
Let us show now that the precessing
Óö mode satisfying resonance condition, as it may be expected, forms a stationary field distribution identical to Yi,„.Indeed, the stationary field in the given point may be represented as a superposition of fields produced by inclined circular mode Yi/ during different phases of its precession, taken with the phase factor exp(iwAa). Here m is an azimuthal wavenumber describing the precession. If the eccentricity is small (single-orbit angular shift Ao'“27r/w), the sum can be substituted by the integral:
e-^w
"^Ôe"""Y||(â(ct+Qt.P),ô(a+Qt,P)) da,(6)
where é=Ëà!&)/27ã/ is the circular phase velocity of precession and Øö
denotes the undisturbed eigenfre-quency of the circular mode. Substituting variables, we can further extract the time-dependent factor from the integral in (6):e-^
the integral in (7) coincides with the formal expansion of spherical harmonic Y|n,=elm'PPm (cosi?) into a superposition of circular modes
Óö(6(à, /?), ô(à, /?))=P{(cos0) exp(i/0) in their own inclined systems of coordinates (â, ô) with the same ft and different a. For this expansion, Euler angles are chosen in such a way that the transformation of coordinates corresponds (i) to the rotation by angle a around z-axis and (ii) rotation around new y-axis by angle ft (see Eq. (A. 1) in Appendix A). Third Euler angle y, denoting subsequent third rotation around new z-axis, is not essential for us and we put it equal to zero. The resulting operation can be regarded as a variety of the inverse Wiegner transform:W. sin^-'^l+cos^)"1 X { e""°'Yn(e,
ô) da . (8)Note that the coefficient before the integral in (8) has only two sharp resonances cos /?= m/!, in accordance with the geometrical consideration.
Hence the precessing circular mode is shown to be identical to the /, m eigenmode with a shifted frequency. The frequency shift, according to (7), is connected with the phase velocity of precession by the simple relation Q= (u)/„,—fc”//)/w.
Expression (8) illustrates the intrinsic connection between arbitrary spherical harmonics and circular modes. The absolute rate of precession is not essential in this representation, because in the high-Q limit, all resonators are nonspherical. Continuing the quantum-mechanical analogy, we can recall that in the case of a long relaxation time of atomic energy levels, even a small external field is sufficient to produce Zeeman or Stark splitting and to give a natural reference for the definition of the momentum projection operator L^. (It is also worth mentioning that the quasi-geometrical formalism of precessing spherical modes has much in common and may be useful for the quasi-classical description of "circular Rydberg atoms" and "Kepler wave packets" that are now extensively investigated in connection with cavity QED and quantum state preparation experiments [15].)
M.L. Gorodetsky. V.S. Ilchenko / Optics Communications 113(1994) 133-143
3. Emission patterns of resonator with prism couplerAs shown in our previous paper [ 4 ], circular modes ÒÅ,/, and TM//„ can be efficiently excited b
y single gaussian beam (Fig. 1) focused on the inner surface of a prism (with refraction index riy larger than that of the resonator n,.) on the contact zone with the resonator under optimal angle 0^arcsin(Wr/Wp). For every mode, one can calculate the quality-factor of the coupling (loading) Q^ that characterizes losses of the mode energy by coupling to the specific radiative modes in the prism. Hereafter, we shall call such radiation modes the emission patterns of WG modes with prism coupler. Optimal coupling is possible if (i) the intrinsic Q-factor of the mode is larger than @l and (ii) the angular spectrum of the input beam coincides with the mode's emission pattern. The above-mentioned basic result of Ref. [4] is that the emission pattern of the Ó// mode is a single gaussian beam coplanar with the mode's orientation in the sphere. Vice versa, if a single gaussian beam is incident on the contact point with a perfect sphere, it will effectively excite a fundamental circular mode Yn co-planar with the plane of incidence.The situation is different if the resonator is non-spherical: any yh mode inclined with respect to the spheroid equator, would precess, and the only stable yh mode can be excited in the equator plane of the resonator spheroid
1?=ë/2. According to the above analysis, inclined beams coming under the angle 0= ±arccos(w//), would excite nondegenerate Ó/„, modes (Fig. 2). Another evident consequence of precession would be occurrence of the second output

Fig. 2. Coupling to whispering-gallery modes in dielectric spheroid. The input beam couples to the coplanar fundamental circular mode Yii. When rotating around the spheroid symmetry axis (coinciding with the stem axis), the processing Yu mode (i) forms the Yi^, mode field distribution and (ii) produces two gaussian beams in the coupling prism.
beam
in the emission pattern of the Ó/,„ modes, symmetrical to the input beam with respect to the equator plane of the resonator spheroid. The full emission pattern would therefore consist of two gaussian beams (two lobes) coming out of the contact zone. One lobe will be formed by emission past an integer number of precession periods, and the other one past a half-integer number of precession periods.The emission patterns of a resonator coupled to the prism can be calculated directly as a result ofFraun-hofer diffraction of the mode near the field penetrating the prism in the contact zone. The size of the emitting zone is determined by the scale of the evanescent field decay outside the resonator, which in turn is described by Hankel function h} '). In case of large / it can be approximated by the exponent exp (- d/ r*) where r* ”
2ëÄ^/è?-1 and d is the gap between the resonator and the prism. Effectively, the coupling zone of the sphere with a plane prism acts as a Gaussian window exp [-(x^+y2)/!^*] for the internal field. For large l-m, the associated Le-gendre function in such a window near equator (i9=7r/2) is well approximated as follows:Pm
(cosff)”C|,„cos(u(ä-ë/2)+(l-m)7l/2) , ^=l(i+l)-m2,Fig. 1. Schematic of prism coupling to whispering-gallery modes.
M.L. Gorodetsky, V.S. llchenko / Optics Communications 113(1994) 133-143
( (1+m)\\ J (/-w)!!' '"l^+m^r^ [(/-w-l)!!'
A calculation of the Fraunhofer integral yields two gaussian beams with the same phases for even l—m and with opposite phases for odd l-m. The polarization lies in the emission plane for each of the two beams for
ÒÅ modes and perpendicular to the emission plane for each of the beams, for TM modes. Angles and angular apertures are determined by the following equations (all inside the prism):m
_"
sin 6>o = ,——, sin Ôî = ,————
-^ÊÃÏð ÊÃÏð
COS ©î^Q'i^—
'i—L—— ^ô2= v •krn],
cos2^ ' km], cos2^ cos2Ôo 'ifl=m thet\âo=0,^â
2=km21
Approximation (9) is evidently valid if ^> ^/7, i.e. when the contact zone covers only a small part of the whole ä-angle field distribution. However, direct numerical
calculations without using approximation (9) have shown that the quantitative estimates (10) do not change significantly and the two-lobe emission patterns are characteristic for all modes down to l-m= 1 and down to small /~ 50. As k depends on q and /, all angles and apertures in (7) depend on all three indexes /. m and q. In this way internal modes of WGMR can be identified through their emission patterns. However, it is appropriate to note that in case of large /” 1 dependence on q is weak (kn^R is close to /). and identification of q requires precise mapping of the field distribution.To conclude this section, let us also present the generalized expression for the prism-loading quality-factor (?l
of arbitrary modes Ó/„,. It can be obtained either in terms of emission by processing fundamental circular modes, or by direct calculation of the mode energy flux through the coupling zone. For TE/,„^ we obtain~~
2npß,.cos20oCOsÔoX(l+/^2/2w2)exp(2a7/•*)
where Ôî, ö
and 6>o are defined by (9) and (10).4. Experimental results
We have studied selective excitation and emission patterns of different whispering-gallery modes in laboratory-produced spherical resonators of fused silica. They were fabricated according to the fusion technology described in our previous papers [1-4,7]. Observations were done in the visible range, at the wavelength /l=633 nm using a helium-neon laser. Since the frequency sweeping range of a He-Ne laser is small (less than 1 GHz;
Ä///<2õ 10-6), we used relatively large spheres of diameter 250 urn (/~ 1800), to provide a dense spectrum of different whispering-gallery modes.Resonators were formed on silica stems 30 um in diameter (Fig. 6a). During the formation of a sphere by fusing in flame, solid stem collar produces axi-symmetrical perturbation of uniform surface tension field. As a result, the final shape is different from perfect sphere, and in the area of naturally defined equator plane (big circle normal to stem axis), the surface can be approximated by ellipsoid of revolution. According to the results of optical microscope observations, the eccentricity of spheroids in our experiment did not exceed the value f < 0.01 (this estimate translates from the measured difference between ellipsoid semiaxes(l±0.3)%).
The schematic of the experiment is evident from Figs. 1, 2. A laser beam is focused by a wide-aperture microscope lens (focal length F=5 mm, N.A. 0.8) into the coupler prism (K-8 glass; rip= 1.515 at ^=633 nm). The focal spot is located in the point of internal reflection (in the front surface plane of the prism). A spherical resonator is put at controllable small distance (d~-0.\n) from the prism surface near the focal spot. The orientation of the input beam (angles Ô and 6>) is controlled by a lateral translation of the initial laser beam with respect to the insertion lens. Small adjustments of the focal spot position in the plane of reflection are achieved by lateral displacements of the insertion lens. The angular dimension of the exciting focused beam (corresponding to the focal spot diameter on the prism surface) is adjusted by expanding the initial laser beam before the focusing lens. Emission patterns of different modes to-
M.L. Gorodetsky, V.S. Ilchenko / Optics Communications 113 (1994) 133-143
gether with a reflected part of the input beam are observed on the screen. For a measurement of the Q-factor, a photodiode is put instead of the screen at optimal position, and the resonance bandwidth is measured by standard technique, with the probe laser frequency swept by the piezo-drive of one of its mirrors. With the change of separation between the resonator and the prism, the observed quality-factor changes between the loaded quality-factor Q^ (zero gap) and intrinsic quality-factor Qo (the asymptotic value obtained during the gradual increase of the gap). In our experiment, Qo varied between (6-8) xl 0s for q=\ modes and (3-6) Xl O7 for "deeper" modes q= 15-20. (The index q was estimated from the value of insertion angle 6>o, see formula (10);
modes with higher q were not accessible due to the limited aperture of the insertion lens at the given position.)
At the initial stage, the resonator was put into contact with the insertion prism. The measured loaded quality-factor varied between Q^ ~ 2 X 105 for /-w=0 and Qi~2xl06 for /-w~100, in agreement with formula (11). After that, the laser frequency was stopped. Varying angles
Ô and 0, we observed effective coupling and re-emission of different groups of modes in accordance with the results of Sect.2. In loaded position, the resonances of neighboring modes overlapped in the frequency domain. At a given constant frequency of the laser, and with the input beam overlapping with different single-mode emission cones, several neighboring modes were simultaneously excited. On the screen, we observed the superposition of the emission patterns of these modes together with the reflected beam. After that, the coupling was reduced (the resonator was put at a larger distance from the prism), and the laser frequency adjusted to match the narrow resonance of a separate given mode. In this case we observed single-mode emission patterns add
ed to the reflected beam (Fig. Çà). With the slow sweep of the laser frequency on, we observed successive flashing of emission patterns from different modes.For the observation of "clean" output patterns of modes, we used an independently translated second (outcoupler) prism on the other side of the resonator (schematic diagram in Fig. 4). The output beam fits the aperture of the insertion lens and goes out in backward direction in the form of two parallel beams corresponding to the two angular lobes of the emission pattern. The output is side-reflected by the mirror and passes through the second lens, which reproduces the emission pattern of the given mode with

Fig. 3. Emission patterns of Yi^, modes (single-mode regime), (a) The intensity in the output area of the prism. Bright spot is the reflected input beam; two small spots is the emission pattern of WG mode; /* 1800, /-
ò õ 120 (angular separation between two emission lobes 2^*40°). (b) "Clean" emission pattern of a WG mode obtained by means of additional output prism; 1-m=4.M.L. Gorodetsky.
ÊË. llchenko / Optics Communications 113(1994) 133-143
Fig. 4. Optical setup for observation of "clean" emission patterns ofWG modes and direct imaging of mode field distributions in the resonator-prism coupling zone.
the prism. The latter is observed on the second screen. Fig. 4b presents a typical "clean" emission pattern for a mode with /- m = 4, obtained by this technique.
The setup shown in Fig. 4 allowed also to obtain a real image of the mode field configuration in the "prism-resonator" contact zone. This was achieved by the slight pulling of the insertion lens away from the prism-resonator assembly so that the microscope configuration emerged. The real image of the mode field was formed on the screen with a magnification of about 1000 (image size about 1 cm). The corresponding images, for different modes are presented in Fig. 5. They reproduce fragments of the corresponding i9-angle distributions P" (cosi?) seen "through the gaussian window" formed by the prism-resonator contact zone. Fig. 5c obtained for the 1—mwlO mode illustrates the appropriateness of the cosine approximation (6) for the latitudinal field distribution in the contact zone, for the case of large /- m.
And finally, we directly observed and photographed field localization zones of different modes on the resonator surface. In a partially loaded resonator (Q~ 1 X 107), manual adjustment of the laser frequency was enough to trace temperature-induced mode-frequency detunings and preserve single-mode excitation, with the visual tuning control by output emission spots. With the given power of the laser ~ 1 mW, exposure times about 1 minute were sufficient to photograph through the microscope the speckle pictures produced by weak surface scattering of light in the area occupied by the e.m. field of whispering-gallery modes (Fig. 6).
Identification of modes in our experiments was made by fitting the observed emission patterns and field distributions to the results of calculations in Sects. 2, 3.
5. Conclusion
The experimental results presented in Sect. 3 illustrate the fruitfulness of the precession approach in predicting the properties of high-Q optical whispering-gallery modes in slightly-aspherical solid dielectric microresonators. Although the notion of precession is only conventionally applicable to the description of stationary fields, it gives a clear physical interpretation to the origin of the observed phenomena: (i) removal of the spatial and frequency degeneracy of WG modes in a real spheroidal resonator;
(ii) excitation ofTE(TM);„,„ modes by the inclined input beams; (iii) emission of the modes in form of two gaussian beams in the coupler prism.
In this paper, we limited ourselves by a description of the emission and coupling properties of "monochromatic" WG modes. However, the precession property puts forward new perspectives for the application of WG mode resonators with prism couplers as spectral devices.
First, the presence of two-lobe emission patterns facilitates an easy realization of the single-prism reentrant narrow-band optical filter on the basis ofWG microresonator. Instead of using two prisms as input and output ports, it is possible to couple the input beam to one of the emission lobes, and the second one would serve as the output. It is evident that the total loss of such filter can be made as small as 3 dB (the full inserted input power equally divided between two output beams) and smaller, if a critical coupling ql= Qo for the selected mode is achieved.
Another possibility can be realized if we further load the resonator until the loaded resonance covers a group of non-degenerate "inclined" modes. In this case, the resonator may serve as a delay line for optical pulses, with the delay time equal to half of the precession period. Since the precession frequency can vary in a wide range between a few hundred kilohertz (single mode bandwidth) and up to 10'° Hz and above (by choosing different resonator size, eccentricity and insertion angles), optical delay times of the order lO^-lO"10 s may be therefore available.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported in part by the International Science Foundation, and by the Quantum Op-
M.L. Gorodetsky, V.S. Ilchenko I Optics Communications 113 (1994) 133-143

Fig. 5. Images of mode field distributions in the resonator-prism coupling zone: (a) l-m=0; (b) l-m=2; (c) l-m”^0 (two neighbouring modes m - 1,
ò + 1 admixed).tics Lab, California Institute of Technology. Authors are grateful to V.B. Braginsky and S.P. Vyatchanin for helpful discussion.
Appendix A
As we could not find expression (8) in the literature we give here its short formal derivation.
We choose a set of new spherical systems of coordinates
(r, ô, â) connected with the old one (r, y>, i9) through the Euler angles a and ft:
sin0cos0=sin;?cos(<”-o') cos P - cos;? sin ft,
sin0sin0=sin i?sin(y”—a) ,
cos Q=
cos i9 cos /?+ sin i? cos (ó—à) sin/?. (A.I)Hence
r//(0(a,/?),<”(a,J8))=^(cos0)exp(i/0)
=(2l-\Ó.\(e^'>'Slnâ)'
=(2/-1)!! (sinffcos((p-a)cosp
-cos^sin/P+isin^sin^-a!))'. (A.2)
142 M.L. Gorodetsky, V.S. Ilchenko / Optics Communications 113(1994) 133-143

Fig. 6. Optical microresonator and speckle photographs of different modes formed by residual surface scattering (sphere diameter 250 \im): (a) WG microresonator under external illumination; (b) /-w=0, (c) /-w=2, (d) l—m”70.
Let us calculate the integral
2ÿI^K^v e-'^sin^cosy/cos/P-cos^sin^
fe'^W^da. (A.3)
•ó
+i sm'Qsmif/)'dy, (A.4)where
Ê is normalization coefficient. It can be shown Substituting (A.2) into (A.3) and making substitu- that the integral in (A.4) satisfies the following dif-tion ó=(/)-à, we have ferential equation:M.L. Gorodetsky, V.S. Ilchenko / Optics Communications 113(1994) 133-143
ä1_
_ / cos P- m òð^ sin^and
^/=^;sin(/-"l)/?(l+cos/?)"l
F(l9,^ã)) . (À.5)If we choose coefficient Ë'in (A.4) as follows:
A'=l/sin</-"^)^8(l+cos^)"', (A.6)
expression (A.4) will not depend on/?. In formal way putting
ft= -ë/2 in (A.4) and comparing resulting equation with the well known Heine integralWcosO^Ie-
0
X^os^+isinasinv/Vdi//, (A.7) we finally obtain
Yt^,(p)=(-l)'~'"
2ä/! sin^-^W+cos/?)"1•Lit
X [ e""" Yit(6,
ô) da . (A.8)References
[ 1 ] V.B. Braginsky and V.S. Ilchenko, Sov. Phys. Doklady 32
(1987)36. [2] V.B. Braginsky, M.L. Gorodetsky and V.S. Ilchenko, Phys.
Leu. A 137 (1989) 393. [ 3 ] M.L. Gorodetsky and V.S. Ilchenko, Laser Physics 2 (1992)
1004. [4] S.P. Vyatchanin, M.L. Gorodetsky and V.S. Ilchenko, Zh.
Prikl. Spektrosk. 56 (1992) 274. [ 5 ] V.S. Ilchenko, M.L. Gorodetsky and S.P. Vyatchanin, Optics
Comm. 107 (1994)41. [ 6 ] Ò. Âàåã,
Optics Lett. 12(1987) 392;H. Taniguchi, Ò. Fujiwara, H. Yamada, S. Tanosaki and M. Baba, Appl. Phys. Lett. 62 (1993) 2155. [7] V.B. Braginsky, M.L. Gorodetsky and V.S. Ilchenko, Laser
Optics'93, Proceedings of SPIE (in press). [8] L. Collot, V. Lefevre-Seguin, M. Brune, J.M. Raimond and
S. Haroche, Europhys. Lett. 23 (1993) 327. [9] S.Schiller and R.L. Byer, Optics Lett. 16 (1991) 1138. [10] E.N. Alyrzaev, M.L. Gorodetsky, A.A. Savchenkov and V.S.
Ilchenko, Chem. Phys. Lett. (1994) (in press). [11] A.B. Matsko, S.P. Vyatchanin, H.J. Kimble and H. Mabuchi, Phys.Lett.A192 (1994) 175;
H. Mabuchi and H.J. Kimble, Optics Lett. (1994) (in press). [ 12] J.C. Swindal, D.H. Leach and R.K. Chang, Optics Lett. 18
(1993)191.
[13] J.A. Stratton, Electromagnetic Theory
Phys.Rev.A41 (1990) 5187.
[15] R.J. Brecha, G. Raithel, C. Wagner and H. Walther, Optics Comm. 102 (1993)257.